The first time I heard about the empty, noisy pail analogy from my dad was 13 years ago. It goes like this:
When you hit an empty pail on the side, it’s noisy. But if it’s full of water, it’s not. It doesn’t even make too much sound.
It’s quite an analogy, even for my dad. And I remember it as clearly as ever just now.
Sometimes I wonder if other people are forgetting that I’m, first and foremost, a designer (and a full-time one at that), and problogging is only a part-time job (if you call it a job). Between the three of us organizers, I think I’m probably the most calloused when it comes to criticism. If I wasn’t, I’d be out of business. If my sensitivity to criticism was similar to that of a Makahiya plant, I’d be bawling every single day I open my inbox.
My clients demand the best service, and that is understandable. They are, after all, paying for my services. So I guess that’s why I take “the header doesn’t look good, I’d prefer it this way†as a venue to improve my work—and not something for me to lose sleep over. But when people cloak personal attacks as criticisms, that’s an entirely different story.
As I have posted last Sunday, we are very grateful for the work done by the volunteers. And the support from the blogging community. And the sponsors. You can just imagine how much it pains me to see personal attacks disguised as criticisms. Sure, it wasn’t directed at any of the three of us organizers. But the volunteers have worked sleepless nights for weeks just to make sure that the Awards Night pulls through. They don’t deserve that kind of treatment. Actually, nobody does.
If you think something needs to be improved, go ahead and say it. Tell us what you think. But resorting to personal attacks will do no good. Did personal attacks offer solutions? No. It only resulted to discord. The total opposite of what the Philippine Blog Awards is all about.
Yes, as bloggers we are all independent publishers. We have right to freedom of speech and free thinking. But freedom is also exercised responsibly, taking into consideration the right of others to respect and dignity. Free thinking isn’t about putting labels on people, is it? Unless I’m mistaken, describing people using degrading adjectives is one of the worst forms of labeling others. Just because somebody doesn’t share your belief doesn’t give you the right to insult them. Yes, you have the right to freedom of speech. But passing unfair judgments to other people for expressing their opinion (not to mention calling them names online) is simply an irresponsible practice of this right to free thinking and speech.
If you abhor any aspect of the Blog Awards, go ahead and say it. We welcome your criticism. Feel free to email me at kutitots[at]gmail[dot]com if you’re shy. We definitely want next year’s Awards to be better than this year’s. But please do us (and everyone) a favor and not cloak your personal attacks as “criticisms.†Insulting other people just because you don’t agree with them will not help improve next year’s Blog Awards.
Remember, there is a big difference between a constructive criticism and one that is not. I’m glad to see that there are a lot of constructive criticisms aimed for the improvement of the event. But unfortunately, there are some that aren’t—and even encouraged promoting discord.
But before you think I’m being defensive or trying to prevent you from practicing your freedom of speech… Fine. Go ahead and make all the noise you want. Insult us organizers. Curse us till kingdom come. Call us inefficient and insensitive. Say what you please about the three of us. Attack us personally. Who cares about blogging responsibly? It’s your blog, not mine. I won’t stop you.
But when time comes and we would once again ask for volunteers, would you heed our call?
My dad was right. The empty pail is indeed the noisier one.
hey gail, you’re some kinda famous ah 😉 congratulations on the blog awards, despite what others say.
Hay…OK lang yan Gail…
Lets keep ourselves composed…Hinga ng malalim..
Sayang ang beauty, wag ka nang magalit 🙂
For tolerance of each others belief:
Dedicated to Pinoy Bloggers
Hay, surely, people love intrigues and this is how the issues are magnified.
You guys did a great job. But we all are too human to make mistakes. And I think you yourselves (Abe) have already acknowledged whatever were the shortcomings during the event. I just hope that people would learn, let-pass and forget about these “issues”, move on and hope for an even better event to happen next time.
There are always people like that. No matter what one do one cant please everybody
you, yuga and jayvee are doers. all of you worked hard to put your great idea into fruition.
others may have had the same great idea but they have a different opinion on how these ideas should have been translated as action.
the difference between you (the organizers) and the other people (those who criticize) is that you did everything to make your idea into a reality. and they… well, they DIDN’T do anything to make their idea come to life.
imho, negative criticisms are given by sour grapers who did not have the guts nor the talent to put an idea into action. unlike all 3 of you who had the balls to do what you thought was good.
paikot ikot ba?
anyway, deadma ka na lang, gail. mamatay na lang sila sa inggit. kayo ang organizers, hindi sila. kung may gusto silang iba gawin, e di gumawa sila ng sarili nila!
Aside from the prayer thingie and the proxy thingie, I think the Blog Awards were more or less ok. The venue was great and I’m guessing the post awards party was great too (I wasn’t there but people seemed to have a good time).
I hope the organizers would realize that entries that appeared on blog were meant to point out irregularities that I found (and quite surprisingly, by a lot of people as well) quite foul and improper. Much has been said on the manner it was made, but the point stands that bigoted things have been done – bigoted things have indeed been said. Yes, he’s your tireless volunteer… yes, I get that. Before you absolve him of anything, kindly read what he said again. People who do acts like that deserve to be called out and be made an example for others to not follow. You are sending a message – a message that you would tolerate such bigoted statements as long as the person who said it is a volunteer. To your credit, you have defended him really well – deviating from the meat of the matter and settling for peripheral issues for the most part.
you really think that asking atheists and other people who felt offended to just grin and bear it was a good idea? do you honestly think that is was logical just because “prayers are standard” (completely untrue)? I don’t think so. you let your biases show by defending people who defended a fundamentally improper act – bigotry.
Had the entries not been written in that manner, I doubt if people would’ve been read a good number of people. A lot of people agreed that changes needed to be done regarding that issue and hopefully, the organizers would not because it was I who posted it.
And yes, the whole vague post is more foul than actually calling out the people you want to call out. you’re denying them the chance to respond to your rhetoric. I think that’s a quite cowardly and unfair. Any reasonable person that this sort of anonymous name calling is more pathetic than a direct statement. Look who’s doing the “cloaking” now?
To end, I would like to clarify that I never personally attacked the organizers of the Philippine Blog Awards. If you continue to think that way, kindly read again.
@benj: Did I say you personally attacked the organizers? Kindly READ AGAIN.
So. It’s ok to personally attack Jomar, because you think he deserved it for saying his opinion? How prejudice is that?
FYI, we already acknowledged your issue about the invocation. And even offered you to volunteer next year so nothing like it happened again. But if you truly wanted to help improve the awards, you wouldn’t have to resort to name-calling. And you gave me three different excuses why you can’t volunteer. If you felt so passionately against how the Awards turned out, then be man enough to actually implement your cause. Or would you rather just absolve yourself from the responsibility of actually doing something other than ranting? Now that’s what I think is cowardly and unfair.
Calling Jomar bigoted, zealous, and presumptuous… Not to mention blinded by faith to the point of insanity… Wow. You don’t think that’s a personal attack? You still think that’s a criticism to improve the awards? REALLY NOW.
Oh, and by the way, I didn’t mention names because I do not want to stoop down to your level of name calling and embarrassing other people just because they don’t share your opinion. This entry was addressed to a lot of people. And since you were the one who reacted violently about it, you brought whatever this entry resulted in upon yourself.
Again.
I define prejudice this way – it’s the act of having a preconceived notion against a person even before someone does something bad. Given that definition, I don’t think calling out Jomar as a bigot doesn’t count as something done as a result of prejudice.
Why?
Again. It was a retaliatory post in reaction to an inflammatory opinion by the said person. Telling aggrieved parties to just “grin and bear” it isn’t exactly a good thing. I have no idea why you continuously choose to defend that. do you honestly think that that sort of mentality is not bigoted? We’ve been having correspondence for the past couple of days and not one sentence from you has even touched that issue. Barring time travel, jomar’s comments preceded your “name-calling” issue.
I have no idea where you deduced that. : |
I made those statements (and I’ve said this repeatedly) against not because of his position as a volunteer – it was done after he posted those inflammatory comments telling the non-religious folk to “grin and bear it”. Again is telling someone to shut up because one is in the minority proper to you? you have never addressed this. does your silence imply that you agree with jomar?
Stop misconstruing my points, please. please. please.
Let’s discuss things based on logic and what actually happened for once and do away with the peripheral issues.
Again, to clarify, the second entry has nothing to do with the Philippine Blog Awards. Yes, it was a personal criticism (and that was quite obvious, i think) as opposed to something meant to improve the awards.
you see Gail, when the rights of others are trampled upon, people will react (in varying degrees). If you don’t think jomar’s post was inflammatory, then the argument stops there. We’ll have to agree to disagree on that one.
Now, if you understand why those comment made me more upset, then you shouldn’t even be asking those questions.