The first time I heard about the empty, noisy pail analogy from my dad was 13 years ago. It goes like this:
When you hit an empty pail on the side, it’s noisy. But if it’s full of water, it’s not. It doesn’t even make too much sound.
It’s quite an analogy, even for my dad. And I remember it as clearly as ever just now.
Sometimes I wonder if other people are forgetting that I’m, first and foremost, a designer (and a full-time one at that), and problogging is only a part-time job (if you call it a job). Between the three of us organizers, I think I’m probably the most calloused when it comes to criticism. If I wasn’t, I’d be out of business. If my sensitivity to criticism was similar to that of a Makahiya plant, I’d be bawling every single day I open my inbox.
My clients demand the best service, and that is understandable. They are, after all, paying for my services. So I guess that’s why I take “the header doesn’t look good, I’d prefer it this way†as a venue to improve my work—and not something for me to lose sleep over. But when people cloak personal attacks as criticisms, that’s an entirely different story.
As I have posted last Sunday, we are very grateful for the work done by the volunteers. And the support from the blogging community. And the sponsors. You can just imagine how much it pains me to see personal attacks disguised as criticisms. Sure, it wasn’t directed at any of the three of us organizers. But the volunteers have worked sleepless nights for weeks just to make sure that the Awards Night pulls through. They don’t deserve that kind of treatment. Actually, nobody does.
If you think something needs to be improved, go ahead and say it. Tell us what you think. But resorting to personal attacks will do no good. Did personal attacks offer solutions? No. It only resulted to discord. The total opposite of what the Philippine Blog Awards is all about.
Yes, as bloggers we are all independent publishers. We have right to freedom of speech and free thinking. But freedom is also exercised responsibly, taking into consideration the right of others to respect and dignity. Free thinking isn’t about putting labels on people, is it? Unless I’m mistaken, describing people using degrading adjectives is one of the worst forms of labeling others. Just because somebody doesn’t share your belief doesn’t give you the right to insult them. Yes, you have the right to freedom of speech. But passing unfair judgments to other people for expressing their opinion (not to mention calling them names online) is simply an irresponsible practice of this right to free thinking and speech.
If you abhor any aspect of the Blog Awards, go ahead and say it. We welcome your criticism. Feel free to email me at kutitots[at]gmail[dot]com if you’re shy. We definitely want next year’s Awards to be better than this year’s. But please do us (and everyone) a favor and not cloak your personal attacks as “criticisms.†Insulting other people just because you don’t agree with them will not help improve next year’s Blog Awards.
Remember, there is a big difference between a constructive criticism and one that is not. I’m glad to see that there are a lot of constructive criticisms aimed for the improvement of the event. But unfortunately, there are some that aren’t—and even encouraged promoting discord.
But before you think I’m being defensive or trying to prevent you from practicing your freedom of speech… Fine. Go ahead and make all the noise you want. Insult us organizers. Curse us till kingdom come. Call us inefficient and insensitive. Say what you please about the three of us. Attack us personally. Who cares about blogging responsibly? It’s your blog, not mine. I won’t stop you.
But when time comes and we would once again ask for volunteers, would you heed our call?
My dad was right. The empty pail is indeed the noisier one.
If your issue is the invocation, then you’re a long way from it. If you really are concerned about it alone, you won’t see the need to call anybody names. Look at other blogs. Those who didn’t appreciate the invocation. Did they call Jomar zealous, bigoted and presumptuous? Only you did.
Who gave you the right to embarrass anybody? For somebody who strongly believed in equality and not trampling on other people’s rights, this seems really contradictory.
I already told you before, if you READ CAREFULLY, that I don’t think prayers are a standard. Jomar thinks that it is, and I respect that. I don’t agree with him, but I don’t call him bigoted, zealous, and presumptuous for believing that. Maybe you should start respecting other people’s opinions other than your own.
And I never told you to shut up because it was improper. I am telling you that you have no right to trample upon a person’s right to dignity and respect. I am telling you to take a look at yourself and see what you are saying. I am telling you to have RESPECT for other people’s opinions other than your own.
If you want to do away with the peripheral issues, then go ahead. Your issue was the invocation, then why was there a need for you to insult Jomar and embarrass him online? He believed it was a standard. You didn’t. That’s his right, and that’s your right. But you didn’t have the right to attack him that way. Because you’re equals.
I don’t think your volunteering (or not volunteering) is a peripheral issue, if that’s what you meant. But I don’t like to assume. Although I strongly believe that would be a solution to your problem. After all, you can’t take our word that we will take note of it in the next bloggers’ event. I believe that it would ensure that you won’t need to worry about having an invocation that will offend you. If you think ranting and insulting people online are better than actually doing something about it, then I really think we will never see eye-to-eye in this issue.
We believe in action. Words are NOTHING without action.
Take a look at Tess’ comment on Abe’s blog. She didn’t agree on the way some things were done, but she’s willing to help out to ensure that the next one is better.
The blog awards is a group effort. Nothing good will come out of insulting people and arguing with everyone who thought the invocation was ok. But in action, there will be.
Ok, sure. I would give you the benefit of the doubt and pledge my participation as a volunteer for the next PBAs.
We’re really not meeting eye-to-eye on the jomar issue though. I think that you’re downplaying it a bit too much. I guess it’s better to stop it now. I guess you can’t grasp the whole “put up and shut up” message that that comment implied.
But I think I’ve helped a lot by putting it into your attention that a lot of people felt that praying was improper. If you consider that “all talk, and no action”, then you’re seriously denying that from this, it was exposed that it was a mistake.
I think ideas also count as “actions” towards a common goal. But that’s just me. the whole action/talk mantra has been all so repetitive in just about every comment I’ve read. I have no idea why you refuse to credit people with ideas – in fact, even tess raised that.
He may have given you that “put up and shut up” impression, but that didn’t give you the right to attack him and embarrass him. It was his opinion, and I respect that. I agree that we will never see eye-to-eye on this, because I respect other people’s opinion and don’t see the need of why they should be called zealous, bigoted, and presumptuous when I don’t agree with them.
Spreading discord is not helping. We have no problems on crediting people for their ideas and feedback, but we do when somebody is using “criticisms” to personally attack somebody else. Excuse me for thinking that, but the three excuses you gave me when I asked you to volunteer really gave the impression that all this ranting is just all talk.
You may be getting tired of “this mantra,” but that’s the whole point of it all. It’s hard to grasp why somebody who’s so passionate of his cause to the point of insulting and embarrassing somebody online, would let trivial things get in the way.
Thank you for volunteering. As I have said, you don’t need to be physically there to volunteer. But taking part in the brainstorming is a lot better than ranting or insulting other people. It’s action.
Huy! Anoba… tama na yan. Hehe. Points have already been made. Gail and Benj will be closing the issues at hand. Conversing thru personal email is more appropriate I suggest, and not thru blog comments. (Parang chat eh, hehe).
The PBA 2007 for me is a milestone event. In fact, it inspired me to take blogging more seriously. But the event is over now. Life goes on…
This situation has been blown beyond proportion. The noisy pail needs to be silenced. And I do believe that the full pails need to stop stroking the empty pail’s ego so that this issue can stop.
@Ade: That’s funny coming from a “concerned” pail.
@ Marcvill: Taking swipes at me, eh?
The empty, noisy pail…
“When you hit an empty pail on the side, it’s noisy. But if it’s full of water, it’s not. It doesn’t even make too much sound.”
Read on how Gail elaborates this quote :)…